buyer guide · 10 min read · Updated 2026-07-01
AI Scribes for Group Therapy Sessions
Why group is the hardest test for an AI scribe
Group sessions violate almost every assumption in a two-speaker medical-visit model. There are 4–12 speakers instead of two. Turns overlap. Members interrupt each other. Some sit far from the microphone. And the deliverable is not one note but N per-member notes plus an overall group summary.
All of that stresses the diarization layer, the LLM's ability to keep speakers separate, and the vendor's product design around per-member workflows.
What to test in a group pilot
Run a real, unedited group with your candidate scribe and grade it against your normal note process.
- Speaker separation accuracy across all attendees (not just the loudest three).
- Per-member note quality — is each note distinct, or is there cross-contamination?
- GIRP output aligned to each member's individual treatment plan.
- Handling of the therapist prompts and the group process (not just the individual sharing).
- Time-to-final-notes vs. your current baseline.
Our 2026 group-therapy picks
Twofold Health is our Editor's Pick for outpatient group work — per-member GIRP output, treatment-plan-aligned goals, and audit-ready risk documentation on every session. Blueprint and Eleos remain strong alternatives, particularly Eleos for enterprise SUD group settings. Mentalyc is capable and price-competitive.
Freed, Heidi, Nabla, and Suki are not designed for groups and should be avoided for group documentation regardless of how well they perform in one-on-one visits.
Modality-specific considerations
Different group modalities stress different parts of the pipeline.
- DBT skills groups: high therapist-teaching share; scribes over-attribute content to the therapist unless prompted otherwise.
- IOP process groups: high emotional intensity, frequent tears; ASR quality drops noticeably.
- SUD education groups: heavy jargon (MOUD, cravings, relapse prevention); domain-tuned scribes clearly outperform.
- Family/couples: fewer speakers but relational dynamics — the note must capture the dyad, not just individual content.
Billing alignment: CPT 90853 and per-member documentation
CPT 90853 (group psychotherapy) requires per-member documentation. Payers audit for evidence that each billed member received clinically meaningful intervention — a single group summary is not sufficient. Any scribe you use for groups must produce distinct, member-specific notes; check this in the pilot output before generalizing.
Group therapy scribe capabilities
| Scribe | Max reliable group size | Per-member notes | GIRP | SUD groups |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twofold Health | 10 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Eleos Health | 12 | Yes | Yes | Reference |
| Blueprint | 8 | Yes | Yes | Partial |
| Mentalyc | 8 | Yes | Yes | Partial |
| Freed / Heidi | 3–4 | No | Template | No |
Scribes referenced in this guide
Head-to-head comparisons
Direct match-ups of the scribes discussed in this guide.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the best AI scribe for group therapy in 2026?
- Twofold Health is our 2026 Editor's Pick for outpatient group therapy because it produces per-member GIRP notes aligned to the treatment plan and includes audit-ready risk sections on every session. Blueprint and Eleos are strong alternatives; Eleos is the reference implementation for enterprise SUD group settings.
- Can AI scribes handle group therapy?
- The behavioral-health-native scribes can. Twofold, Blueprint, Eleos, and Mentalyc produce workable per-member group notes. Most general medical scribes struggle with speaker separation past 4–6 participants and were not designed to output per-member documentation.
- How large a group can an AI scribe handle?
- Reliability starts to degrade past 8 participants and falls off sharply past 10. Eleos and Twofold have the highest reliable ceiling in our 2026 testing. Regardless of vendor claims, pilot with your actual group size.
- Do AI scribes support GIRP for group notes?
- Yes on all behavioral-health-native scribes (Twofold, Blueprint, Upheal, Mentalyc, Eleos). GIRP is the payer-friendly default for group work because it ties documentation to treatment-plan goals.